| Páginas sobre el tema: [1 2] > | Peer comments - more choices may help Autor de la hebra: RHELLER
|
|---|
RHELLER
Estados Unidos
Local time: 21:45
francés al inglés
+ ...
Dear Colleagues:
I have just posted something similar in the French forum. Some \"neutral\" and \"disagree\" comments make proziens very upset.
I would like to propose a change in the KudoZ comment section.
Personally, I find that \"neutral\" and \"disagree\" are too vague.
I think it would be more constructive to give more detailed comment.
It might also help everyone to understand why you disagree.
... See more Dear Colleagues:
I have just posted something similar in the French forum. Some \"neutral\" and \"disagree\" comments make proziens very upset.
I would like to propose a change in the KudoZ comment section.
Personally, I find that \"neutral\" and \"disagree\" are too vague.
I think it would be more constructive to give more detailed comment.
It might also help everyone to understand why you disagree.
For example, a system with 4 grades:
1 - opposite meaning; does not translate the meaning well
2 - problem with grammar or syntax
3 - needs references; one good response among many (not the best)
4 - good - agree
Instead of responding with neutral, disagree, or agree -
we could give a 1,2,3 or 4.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Rita
[addsig] ▲ Collapse
| | | | Uldis Liepkalns 
Letonia
Local time: 06:45
Miembro 2003
inglés al letón
+ ...
| Definitely not a bad suggestion | May 17, 2003 |
In my opinion...
Uldis
Quote:
On 2003-05-17 01:42, RHELLER wrote:
Dear Colleagues:
I have just posted something similar in the French forum. Some \"neutral\" and \"disagree\" comments make proziens very upset.
I would like to propose a change in the KudoZ comment section.
Personally, I find that \"neutral\" and \"disagree\" are
... See more In my opinion...
Uldis
Quote:
On 2003-05-17 01:42, RHELLER wrote:
Dear Colleagues:
I have just posted something similar in the French forum. Some \"neutral\" and \"disagree\" comments make proziens very upset.
I would like to propose a change in the KudoZ comment section.
Personally, I find that \"neutral\" and \"disagree\" are too vague.
I think it would be more constructive to give more detailed comment.
It might also help everyone to understand why you disagree.
For example, a system with 4 grades:
1 - opposite meaning; does not translate the meaning well
2 - problem with grammar or syntax
3 - needs references; one good response among many (not the best)
4 - good - agree
Instead of responding with neutral, disagree, or agree -
we could give a 1,2,3 or 4.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Rita
[addsig] ▲ Collapse
| | | | gianfranco
Brasil
Local time: 00:45
Miembro 2001
inglés al italiano
+ ...
| Add a short comment to the available three main choices | May 17, 2003 |
Quote:
2003-05-17 01:42 RHELLER wrote:
...snip...
Personally, I find that \"neutral\" and \"disagree\" are too vague.
...snip...
You can already add a short comment to the current 3 choices available, to explain the reason for your neutral or disagree, or even to add something to an otherwise good answer.
In my o... See more Quote:
2003-05-17 01:42 RHELLER wrote:
...snip...
Personally, I find that \"neutral\" and \"disagree\" are too vague.
...snip...
You can already add a short comment to the current 3 choices available, to explain the reason for your neutral or disagree, or even to add something to an otherwise good answer.
In my opinion, having too many pre-defined choices could be confusing and difficult to use.
Gianfranco
[ 2003-05-17 12:16] ▲ Collapse
| | | | | The reason for Rita's suggestion | May 17, 2003 |
When I first saw Rita\'s suggestion it seemed to me that it wouldn\'t change that much, as we already have space enough to justify our comments or peer greading, but the reason for her suggestion is to avoid the words \"disagree\" (particularly) and neutral. Many people can\'t suffer to get one and it\'s the beginning for personal wars.
| | |
|
|
|
RHELLER
Estados Unidos
Local time: 21:45
francés al inglés
+ ...
PERSONA QUE INICIÓ LA HEBRA | Thank you Claudia | May 17, 2003 |
The same discussion is going on in the French forum -
http://www.proz.com/?sp=bb/viewtopic&topic_id=11108&forum_id=25
Claudia is right to bring up the \"personal attack\" aspect. Some people simply can\'t handle \"disagree\".
A numbered system will always be more objectively viewed by the one who is being criticized. Often ... See more The same discussion is going on in the French forum -
http://www.proz.com/?sp=bb/viewtopic&topic_id=11108&forum_id=25
Claudia is right to bring up the \"personal attack\" aspect. Some people simply can\'t handle \"disagree\".
A numbered system will always be more objectively viewed by the one who is being criticized. Often no reasoning is given for a \"disagree\" which may lead to feeling as though one is being arbitrarily attacked.
It will not take up more room and would make it easier, not harder, to grade answers.
Those who compose surveys know that people are much more willing to check off a number than write a sentence.
Just a suggestion..
Have a good weekend,
Rita
[addsig] ▲ Collapse
| | | | CHENOUMI (X)
inglés al francés
+ ...
Quote: Many people can\'t suffer to get one and it\'s the beginning for personal wars.
Many reasonable people would find that attributing an unjustified \"disagree\" just for the sake of it, and without reasonable justification totally unacceptable.
Quote: Claudia is right to bring up the \"personal attack\" aspect. Some people simply ... See more Quote: Many people can\'t suffer to get one and it\'s the beginning for personal wars.
Many reasonable people would find that attributing an unjustified \"disagree\" just for the sake of it, and without reasonable justification totally unacceptable.
Quote: Claudia is right to bring up the \"personal attack\" aspect. Some people simply can\'t handle \"disagree\"
It is unfortunate that the authors of pointed and arrogant \"disagree\" are often left off the hook by the same people who are prone to condemn reaction of the recipients.
Politeness is not a one-way street. And it would be wise for people not to judge and condemn when they don\'t know the dynamics of a relationship between two individuals, when they are unaware of all details, and when previous skirmishes are untold.
To get back to the subject of the day, the current sistem is fine. I\'ve seen others convey their disagreement in such a stylish manner that it doesn\'t feel like a \"personal attack\" or a negative input at all. Their softened and skillfully expressed view is not an outburst of antagonism.
(I am not referring to the circumstances of the thread you have indicated), but in general.
On the other hand, \"Neutral\" peer-gradings are often a way for colleagues to express their disagreement and a different approach. Some have done it remarkably well, and I salute them.
Sans rancune.
[ This Message was edited by:on2003-05-18 04:30] ▲ Collapse
| | | | Rick Henry
Estados Unidos
Local time: 22:45
italiano al inglés
+ ...
| Not sure about neutral, but... | May 17, 2003 |
for disagrees, I think a comment/note is required. I agree three choices are enough, given you can add comments to your grade.
R.
==
Quote:
On 2003-05-17 11:55, gianfranco wrote:
You can already add a short comment to the current 3 choices available, to explain the reason for your neutral or disagree, or even to add something to an otherwise good answer.
| | | | Uldis Liepkalns
Letonia
Local time: 06:45
Miembro 2003
inglés al letón
+ ...
| This is two-way road | May 17, 2003 |
I have partnership/business relations with many answerers, therefore I usually my \"disagree\", instead of the red \"DISAGREE\", express as \"neutral\".
OTOH, some \"disagrees\" I have received, were formulated in suchlike way: \"your English is very poor, if I had time, I would make a much better suggestion\".
Needless to say, though I have no relations with this person, but I remember him/her not kindly- the more so the sentence which asker asked to translate was nightmare... See more I have partnership/business relations with many answerers, therefore I usually my \"disagree\", instead of the red \"DISAGREE\", express as \"neutral\".
OTOH, some \"disagrees\" I have received, were formulated in suchlike way: \"your English is very poor, if I had time, I would make a much better suggestion\".
Needless to say, though I have no relations with this person, but I remember him/her not kindly- the more so the sentence which asker asked to translate was nightmare in the source language, to begin with.
_________________
comma added 
[ This Message was edited by: uldis on 2003-05-17 22:57] ▲ Collapse
| | |
|
|
|
Albina
inglés al albanés
+ ...
| Agree with Rita | May 18, 2003 |
Excellent proposal. As it is now, the Disagree choice is often abused by a few colleagues. In one of my SC, I have seen members give a Disagree just because they dislike the person, even though the answer is often perfect!!! Rita\'s proposal of having four choices in this area might help change this situation and leave no more room for misuse.
Wishing everyone a lovely weekend.
________________________________
1 - opposite meaning; does not tr... See more Excellent proposal. As it is now, the Disagree choice is often abused by a few colleagues. In one of my SC, I have seen members give a Disagree just because they dislike the person, even though the answer is often perfect!!! Rita\'s proposal of having four choices in this area might help change this situation and leave no more room for misuse.
Wishing everyone a lovely weekend.
________________________________
1 - opposite meaning; does not translate the meaning well
2 - problem with grammar or syntax
3 - needs references; one good response among many (not the best)
4 - good - agree
▲ Collapse
| | | | Ralf Lemster
Alemania
Local time: 05:45
inglés al alemán
+ ...
| Peer-grading should be independent | May 18, 2003 |
Hi uldis,
Quote:
I have partnership/business relations with many answerers, therefore I usually my \"disagree\", instead of the red \"DISAGREE\", express as \"neutral\".
:57]
Peer-grading should be independent of any relationship with the answerer (regardless whether that\'s personal, business or both). IOW: if you disagree, use a \"disagree\", and provide a courteous explanation.
... See more Hi uldis,
Quote:
I have partnership/business relations with many answerers, therefore I usually my \"disagree\", instead of the red \"DISAGREE\", express as \"neutral\".
:57]
Peer-grading should be independent of any relationship with the answerer (regardless whether that\'s personal, business or both). IOW: if you disagree, use a \"disagree\", and provide a courteous explanation.
Best, Ralf ▲ Collapse
| | | | | Using numbers proved *more* disagreeable (but thanks for the suggestion!) | May 18, 2003 |
We used to use a numeric form of peer review. It was very unpopular. Seems people can suffer a \"disagree\" better than a \"1\".
However, I understand the sentiment of your proposal. Some others have suggested removing \"disagrees\" altogether. It is under consideration (but not high on the list of priorities.)
Thanks for your suggestion!
| | | | Steffen Walter
Alemania
Local time: 05:45
Miembro 2002
inglés al alemán
+ ...
| But where do we go from here, Henry? | May 18, 2003 |
Hi Henry,
Commenting on the possibility of abolishing/removing \"disagrees\":
However, I understand the sentiment of your proposal. Some others have suggested removing \"disagrees\" altogether. It is under consideration (but not high on the list of priorities.)
What alternative would you have in mind to replace \"disagrees\" once they have been \"removed\"? Actually, a courteous, qualified and well-founded \"disagree\" can be of great help for the asker. Also, I think that a numbered system (without any verbal comment??) won\'t change much but would even deprive us from lively, often extremely valuable, discussions ensuing after suggestion of answers.
Suggestion: Change the \"disagree\" colour from red to something less obtrusive (simply black?) - many people tend to go by visual impression first and may feel attacked by the red, not by the content shown behind the grade.
My 2 cents,
Steffen
| | |
|
|
|
Uldis Liepkalns
Letonia
Local time: 06:45
Miembro 2003
inglés al letón
+ ...
| That's good idea | May 18, 2003 |
Quote:
Suggestion: Change the \"disagree\" colour from red to something less obtrusive (simply black?) - many people tend to go by visual impression first and may feel attacked by the red, not by the content shown behind the grade.
[addsig]
| | | | RHELLER
Estados Unidos
Local time: 21:45
francés al inglés
+ ...
PERSONA QUE INICIÓ LA HEBRA | Interesting debate! | May 18, 2003 |
Thanks to everyone - this is an interesting debate.
I agree with Albina and with Steffen. I do believe that part of the grade is a \"popularity contest\". This reminds me of high school, which is unfortunate. (33 years later!)
My other comment concerns \"neutral\". I use it instead of \"disagree\" because it is less offensive BUT I really think it conveys nothing. The term \"neutral\" by definition does not take sides, so what is the purpose?
... See more Thanks to everyone - this is an interesting debate.
I agree with Albina and with Steffen. I do believe that part of the grade is a \"popularity contest\". This reminds me of high school, which is unfortunate. (33 years later!)
My other comment concerns \"neutral\". I use it instead of \"disagree\" because it is less offensive BUT I really think it conveys nothing. The term \"neutral\" by definition does not take sides, so what is the purpose?
The asker needs to know what his peers think of the proposed answers so that he/she can make an \"educated\" decision. \"Neutral\" does not really help.
I have sometimes received 1 or 2 points instead of 4 points and still felt better than a \"disagree\". I realize it\'s not exactly the same.
Re: color RED
It does make the situation worse. Black numbers would be the most neutral way of listing choices.
Thanks,
Rita
[addsig] ▲ Collapse
| | | | | See a disagree positively | May 19, 2003 |
Hi,
I agree with Steffen: a disagree can be a very useful mean and I add it should be seen positively.
A disagree without a comment (= reason why) has IMHO absolutely no meaning.
Perhaps, we should better define when a disagree should be used:
disagree = I am 100% sure it is wrong (or not suitable for the given context) because of reason X
neutral = I am not 100% sure because XY etc.
... See more Hi,
I agree with Steffen: a disagree can be a very useful mean and I add it should be seen positively.
A disagree without a comment (= reason why) has IMHO absolutely no meaning.
Perhaps, we should better define when a disagree should be used:
disagree = I am 100% sure it is wrong (or not suitable for the given context) because of reason X
neutral = I am not 100% sure because XY etc.
agree = I am sure it is correct or suitable for the context, with or without explanation.
A different colour for disagrees is only cosmetics, doesn\'t change the substance .
A well-put disagree forces indirectly an answerer to think (and double-check) twice before sending a proposal (nobody likes a disagree, but if we are wrong, we have to accept criticism.... and know in advance it might come).
What I can\'t understand is a disagree without comment, being 100% or without checking whether the proposed term alternatively suitable 
Giuliana
[addsig] ▲ Collapse
| | | | | Páginas sobre el tema: [1 2] > | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » Peer comments - more choices may help | Anycount & Translation Office 3000 | Translation Office 3000
Translation Office 3000 is an advanced accounting tool for freelance translators and small agencies. TO3000 easily and seamlessly integrates with the business life of professional freelance translators.
More info » |
| | CafeTran Espresso | You've never met a CAT tool this clever!
Translate faster & easier, using a sophisticated CAT tool built by a translator / developer.
Accept jobs from clients who use Trados, MemoQ, Wordfast & major CAT tools.
Download and start using CafeTran Espresso -- for free
Buy now! » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |
Login to reply/comment 
