Număr de pagini:   [1 2] >
Poll: Have you ever edited a Wikipedia article?
Inițiatorul discuției: ProZ.com Staff
ProZ.com Staff
ProZ.com Staff
PERSONAL PROZ.COM
Apr 27, 2010

This forum topic is for the discussion of the poll question "Have you ever edited a Wikipedia article?".

View the poll results »



 
Mary Worby
Mary Worby  Identity Verified
Regatul Unit
Local time: 03:20
din germană în engleză
+ ...
I voted 'other' Apr 27, 2010

Because there was no option to say just plain no. I have never edited a Wikipedia article and I don't feel particularly strongly either way. I would if I felt it needed doing but I think my life would be nonetheless complete if I never did!

 
lillkakan
lillkakan
Local time: 04:20
din engleză în suedeză
Yes, plenty Apr 27, 2010

I'm a bit surprised that so many haven't. I have written parts of a few articles, but mostly I just do linguistic fixing and supply and format references to existing ones. Twice I have been paid to translate/write and wiki format articles.

 
Russell Jones
Russell Jones  Identity Verified
Regatul Unit
Local time: 03:20
din italiană în engleză
I tried Apr 27, 2010

I tried once but just got lost in the complex procedures and gave up.

 
Susanna Martoni
Susanna Martoni  Identity Verified
Italia
Local time: 04:20
Membru (2009)
din spaniolă în italiană
+ ...
Gave up Apr 27, 2010

Russell Jones wrote:

I tried once but just got lost in the complex procedures and gave up.


The same has happened to me. Discouraging!


 
Dai Kodato
Dai Kodato
Japonia
Local time: 11:20
din japoneză în engleză
+ ...
Yes, since 2004 Apr 27, 2010

About 12,000 edits combined between English and Japanese account.

Right now, I don't actually do much translation and instead is working on updating a series of pages. I still have about 2,000 edits to go which should take 6 months if not more at the current pace.


 
Suzan Hamer
Suzan Hamer  Identity Verified
Ţările de Jos
Local time: 04:20
engleză
+ ...
Ditto Apr 27, 2010

Mary Worby wrote:

Because there was no option to say just plain no. I have never edited a Wikipedia article and I don't feel particularly strongly either way. I would if I felt it needed doing but I think my life would be nonetheless complete if I never did!


 
Interlangue (X)
Interlangue (X)
Angola
Local time: 04:20
din engleză în franceză
+ ...
Just once Apr 27, 2010

... the biography of a contemporary author was not complete - I happened to know him personally.

 
neilmac
neilmac
Spania
Local time: 04:20
din spaniolă în engleză
+ ...
Other Apr 27, 2010

Probably. I vaguely recall editing (or at least attempting to) a badly drafted wikipedia page, what I don't remember is whether I managed to jump through all the hoops allowing the changes to be saved (logging in, authentication etc) ...
I reckon I most likely ended up "lost in the complex procedures" as I am not reknowned for my patience with these things.

[Edited at 2010-04-27 09:49 GMT]


 
vixen
vixen  Identity Verified
Grecia
Local time: 05:20
din engleză în olandeză
+ ...
Other = a simple no Apr 27, 2010

Mary said it all.

Mary Worby wrote:

Because there was no option to say just plain no. I have never edited a Wikipedia article and I don't feel particularly strongly either way. I would if I felt it needed doing but I think my life would be nonetheless complete if I never did!


 
Christine Andersen
Christine Andersen  Identity Verified
Danemarca
Local time: 04:20
Membru (2003)
din daneză în engleză
+ ...
Me too Apr 27, 2010

Mary Worby wrote:

Because there was no option to say just plain no. I have never edited a Wikipedia article and I don't feel particularly strongly either way. I would if I felt it needed doing but I think my life would be nonetheless complete if I never did!


Quite apart from work, by the time I have had my say on this site, composed a letter to the newspaper and possibly sent it, had a little exercise and thought about supper, time is getting short and I feel I ought to shut down my computer for the day.


 
Rebecca Garber
Rebecca Garber  Identity Verified
Local time: 22:20
Membru (2005)
din germană în engleză
+ ...
I've absolutely no interest Apr 27, 2010

in taking the time to submit a carefully researched article on medieval German Dominican women, my graduate specialty, and have it *corrected* by trolls who can't read modern German, let alone the medieval mss and Latin required for the topic. I watched that done to a friend's article on "Feudalism", which incorporated the research from the last 20 years. The article was "corrected" back to the state of scholarship from the 1920's. And there it stands. And the scholars get shouted down becau... See more
in taking the time to submit a carefully researched article on medieval German Dominican women, my graduate specialty, and have it *corrected* by trolls who can't read modern German, let alone the medieval mss and Latin required for the topic. I watched that done to a friend's article on "Feudalism", which incorporated the research from the last 20 years. The article was "corrected" back to the state of scholarship from the 1920's. And there it stands. And the scholars get shouted down because no one is considered more knowlegeable than anyone else on wikipedia, regardless of facts.Collapse


 
Chun Un
Chun Un  Identity Verified
Macao
Membru (2007)
din engleză în chineză
+ ...
Yes, many times Apr 27, 2010

but the edits were mainly concerned with typo, spelling, grammar or obvious human errors.

[Edited at 2010-04-27 14:28 GMT]


 
David Russi
David Russi  Identity Verified
Statele Unite
Local time: 20:20
din engleză în spaniolă
+ ...
Yes Apr 27, 2010

Many pages are badly translated, and require at least some good polish, some are badly botched, many contain translation errors of various types (and you don't always know what the original text was). I have corrected inappropriate terminology, because this poses a real problem, especially for fields that do not have much information available, and there is a danger of that misinformation being disseminated (wikipedia pages can appear on a number of sites, so if you search a specific term that o... See more
Many pages are badly translated, and require at least some good polish, some are badly botched, many contain translation errors of various types (and you don't always know what the original text was). I have corrected inappropriate terminology, because this poses a real problem, especially for fields that do not have much information available, and there is a danger of that misinformation being disseminated (wikipedia pages can appear on a number of sites, so if you search a specific term that only appears on a wikipedia page, you may find dozens of hits, which are, in fact, one and the same).

That said, it is time consuming, so I really try to keep it to a minimum... for some pages, sometimes I just leave notes, hoping someone else wil take the time.
Collapse


 
Rolf Kern
Rolf Kern  Identity Verified
Elveţia
Local time: 04:20
din engleză în germană
+ ...
In Memoriam
Other Apr 27, 2010

One time I edited one.

 
Număr de pagini:   [1 2] >


To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator:

Moderatorii acestui forum
Jared Tabor[Call to this topic]

You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request »

Poll: Have you ever edited a Wikipedia article?






Trados Business Manager Lite
Create customer quotes and invoices from within Trados Studio

Trados Business Manager Lite helps to simplify and speed up some of the daily tasks, such as invoicing and reporting, associated with running your freelance translation business.

More info »
Trados Studio 2022 Freelance
The leading translation software used by over 270,000 translators.

Designed with your feedback in mind, Trados Studio 2022 delivers an unrivalled, powerful desktop and cloud solution, empowering you to work in the most efficient and cost-effective way.

More info »