as a reflection on itself
Explanation: Stephanie, I think you're pretty spot-on with your focus on identity. The usage is clearly reflexive, and, interestingly, if 'as a reflection on itself' is used, it has double sense of 'reflecting' as something one does, but also 'reflecting' in the sense of a mirror image. The Movement is working itself out, deciding what it is. I do think you could stick with 'defining their own identity', however, so take my suggestion with the lightness intended.
| mikecassady Local time: 10:01 Works in field Native speaker of: English
|
|
27 mins confidence: peer agreement (net): +1 in revealing its true self
Explanation: I don't think people should be involved in this as Surrealism in itself is more than its artists. Artists are themselves prone to their own execution, ideas and opinions, but Surrealism in itself is not. Therefore, the debates with the PC help in revealing the true and vast nature of Surrealism. 'A lui-même' is not really necessary as you are talking abstract.
-------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2 hrs (2011-05-06 17:27:49 GMT) --------------------------------------------------
I meant to say that Surrealism is not a person, so it is hard to express 'à lui-même' without resulting in 'revealing itself to itself' or something of the kind, which does not read well. Actually, IMO, the phrase really means that even Surrealism and its core artists did not really know what it was and thus it developed to what we know now during those debates and no doubt through a lot of other occurrences. Therefore, the idea of Surrealism is abstract (it is not defined at that point) and it cannot really reveal itself to itself in English as it still has to learn what its self is. In French, 'lui-même' works better, also because it is not the same word as the subject and it reads better.
| Kirsten Bodart United Kingdom Local time: 19:01 Native speaker of: Dutch, English PRO pts in category: 3
|
| | Notes to answerer
Asker: I am not sure what you mean by abstract, are you saying that definiting itself is an abstract idea? Whereas revealing its true self is not abstract?
|
|
|
|